TBD
To Win
C. Ilkel
To Win
Cem Ilkel vs Adam Jones Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W L W L W W L W
Form
L W L L L W W L W LHead To Head: Ilkel 1 - 0 Jones
They have played 2 sets in total, with Ilkel winning 2 and Jones winning 0. The last match between Ilkel and Jones was at the M25 Doha, 20-01-2025, Q3, Hard with Cem Ilkel getting the victory 6-1 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Cem Ilkel | 1 |
| Adam Jones | 0 |
M25 Doha(20-01-2025)
6
1
6
1
| Ilkel | Stats | Jones |
|---|---|---|
| 79% (27-7) | YTD Win/Loss | 50% (6-6) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 574 | Ranking | N/A |
| 144 | Highest Rank | N/A |
| 29 | Age | 26 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 7 | Titles | 0 |
| 57% (435-333) | Career Total W/L | 49% (146-151) |
| $225,530 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 2 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
TBD VS Ilkel
- / Second
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Maneiro VS Frech PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Starodubtseva VS Fruhvirtova PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
23 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-1 |
Stats 
Cem Ilkel
Player
Adam Jones
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
72%
(
34 of
47)
8
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
60
Total Points Won
31
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 2 |
| 8 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:8:36 | Average Match Time | 1:8:36 |
| 61% (27/44) | 1st Serve % | 72% (34/47) |
| 78% (21/27) | 1st Serve Win % | 32% (11/34) |
| 59% (10/17) | 2nd Serve Win % | 54% (7/13) |
| 63% (5/8) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 62% (29/47) | Return Points Win % | 30% (13/44) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Cem Ilkel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Kanan Gasimov
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
75)
8
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
19 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
76
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Saba Purtseladze
Player
Cem Ilkel
61%
(
47 of
77)
1st Serve %
76%
(
62 of
82)
11
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
39 of
62)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
24 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
31 of
82)
84
Total Points Won
75
|
6-1 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Matteo Lavizzari
58%
(
57 of
98)
1st Serve %
60%
(
59 of
99)
6
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
6
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
47 of
59)
56%
(
23 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
35%
(
34 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
35 of
99)
99
Total Points Won
98
|
6-4 2-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
David Poljak
61%
(
62 of
101)
1st Serve %
62%
(
68 of
110)
9
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
3
74%
(
46 of
62)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
47 of
68)
64%
(
25 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
30%
(
30 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
41 of
110)
112
Total Points Won
99
|
6-7(3) 7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mert Alkaya
Player
Cem Ilkel
57%
(
35 of
61)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
58)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
24 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Henri Haupt
31%
(
4 of
13)
1st Serve %
73%
(
11 of
15)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
100%
(
4 of
4)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
89%
(
8 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
8%
(
1 of
13)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
10 of
15)
22
Total Points Won
6
|
5-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Stefanos Sakellaridis
Player
Cem Ilkel
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve %
56%
(
46 of
82)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
82)
76
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Tuncay Duran
68%
(
50 of
74)
1st Serve %
77%
(
67 of
87)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
39 of
67)
75%
(
18 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
25 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
87)
86
Total Points Won
75
|
3-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Jordan Correia Passos Do Carmo
65%
(
48 of
74)
1st Serve %
62%
(
53 of
86)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
25 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
86)
88
Total Points Won
72
|
6-2 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Pepijn Bastiaansen
64%
(
43 of
67)
1st Serve %
66%
(
35 of
53)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
24 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
53)
66
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Adam Jones Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
David Fix
Player
Adam Jones
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve %
70%
(
48 of
69)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
28%
(
17 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
31 of
69)
74
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Andy Nguyen
Player
Adam Jones
61%
(
43 of
70)
1st Serve %
77%
(
37 of
48)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
37%
(
10 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
39%
(
27 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
66
Total Points Won
52
|
7-6(8) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Adam Jones
Player
Ryan Dickerson
61%
(
52 of
85)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
7
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
40%
(
34 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
23 of
55)
74
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-7(4) 10-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 7-5 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Adam Jones
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
72%
(
34 of
47)
8
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
60
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Adam Jones
Player
Felix Mischker
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve %
58%
(
31 of
53)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
23 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yanaki Milev
Player
Adam Jones
51%
(
18 of
35)
1st Serve %
62%
(
28 of
45)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
94%
(
17 of
18)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
7 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
56
Total Points Won
24
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57% (435/333) | Win/Loss | 49% (146/151) |
| 55% (972/804) | Sets Win/Loss | 49% (317/332) |
| 52% (8713/8186) | Games Win/Loss | 50% (3179/3151) |
| 62% (285/177) | Hard Win/Loss | 53% (105/94) |
| 45% (57/71) | Clay Win/Loss | 41% (13/19) |
| 55% (92/76) | Indoor Hard W/L | 44% (28/35) |
| 10% (1/9) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/3) |
| 0.34 | Aces Per Game | 0.15 |
| 2827 | Aces Total | 449 |
| 0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.14 |
| 1375 | Total Double Faults | 446 |
| 1:14:53 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 531.62 | Average Opponent Rank | 81.18 |
| 58% (23847/40815) | 1st Serve % | 60% (5247/8679) |
| 70% (16772/23847) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (3560/5247) |
| 51% (8657/16968) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (1701/3431) |
| 40% (1611/3986) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (262/621) |
| 39% (16081/41306) | Return Points Win % | 36% (3003/8263) |
| 32% (7/15) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 67% (2/1) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 32% (7/15) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 18% (5/23) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 52% (175/159) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 67% (239/120) | Futures W/L | 49% (146/150) |
| 56% (423/749) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 49% (142/289) |
| 40% (4/10) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 54% (146/272) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (35/67) |
| 56% (129/231) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (34/63) |
| 85% (422/360) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 91% (145/132) |
| 14% (422/60) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 9% (145/13) |
| 21% (345/73) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 9% (152/14) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
